<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finding Keywords with SEO Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://impnerd.com/web-development/finding-keywords-seo-tools/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://impnerd.com/web-development/finding-keywords-seo-tools</link>
	<description>Internet - Marketing - Publishing</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Graham Smith</title>
		<link>http://impnerd.com/web-development/finding-keywords-seo-tools#comment-1967</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impnerd.com/web-development/finding-keywords-seo-tools#comment-1967</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I agree about Wordtracker. Although for different reasons, I have had adequate luck with the one of the alternatives, which suit my purpose just fine. But then Im not anal about it, and nothing wrong in being anal either. :)

But going to give the other's a try on a new site I am putting together. It's a business I have no experience of, so having to rely on the clients ideas of what are good keywords then finding alternatives using the above services.

Sometime I think it's easier to find keywords for a profession or business you don't know c
because you are not tied in with the same old familiar terms that you are convinced are what everyone else must use. YOu are having to start from scratch, almost like someone who is going to be searching for that new site... If that makes sense. Doing your own keywords I feel can be, in some cases, counerproductive if you don't allow yourself to think outside the box.

Hence why these services are so valuable.

&lt;b&gt;Have I just stated the obvious here?&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree about Wordtracker. Although for different reasons, I have had adequate luck with the one of the alternatives, which suit my purpose just fine. But then Im not anal about it, and nothing wrong in being anal either. <img src='http://impnerd.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But going to give the other&#8217;s a try on a new site I am putting together. It&#8217;s a business I have no experience of, so having to rely on the clients ideas of what are good keywords then finding alternatives using the above services.</p>
<p>Sometime I think it&#8217;s easier to find keywords for a profession or business you don&#8217;t know c<br />
because you are not tied in with the same old familiar terms that you are convinced are what everyone else must use. YOu are having to start from scratch, almost like someone who is going to be searching for that new site&#8230; If that makes sense. Doing your own keywords I feel can be, in some cases, counerproductive if you don&#8217;t allow yourself to think outside the box.</p>
<p>Hence why these services are so valuable.</p>
<p><b>Have I just stated the obvious here?</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://impnerd.com/web-development/finding-keywords-seo-tools#comment-1654</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impnerd.com/web-development/finding-keywords-seo-tools#comment-1654</guid>
		<description>Careful with wordtracker. Lately I'm not satisfied with their services any more. Besides being quite expensive ($350 a year), it's full with irrelevant and spammy search queries. A new comer could be easily fooled by them, when searching for good KEI combinations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful with wordtracker. Lately I&#8217;m not satisfied with their services any more. Besides being quite expensive ($350 a year), it&#8217;s full with irrelevant and spammy search queries. A new comer could be easily fooled by them, when searching for good KEI combinations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
